Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Página inicial / What Is the Name for Monitoring Bodily Processes So That a Patient Can Learn to Control Them?

What Is the Name for Monitoring Bodily Processes So That a Patient Can Learn to Control Them?

Postar um comentário
  • Commentary
  • Open Access
  • Published:

Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-cess and monitoring

  • Elvis Camacho1,
  • Mickey E Abrahamone,
  • Samuel S Bruce2,
  • Emmanuel LP Dumont2,
  • Brad E Zacharia1,
  • Randy D'Amicothree,
  • Justin Slomianfour,
  • Jean Yves Reginster4,
  • Olivier Bruyèrefour &
  • E Sander Connolly Jrane

Athenaeum of Public Health book 72, Article number:28 (2014) Cite this article

  • 33k Accesses

  • 236 Citations

  • 28 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Background

Innovations in mobile and electronic healthcare are revolutionizing the involvement of both doctors and patients in the modern healthcare system past extending the capabilities of physiological monitoring devices. Despite significant progress within the monitoring device industry, the widespread integration of this technology into medical practice remains limited. The purpose of this review is to summarize the developments and clinical utility of smart wear torso sensors.

Methods

We reviewed the literature for connected device, sensor, trackers, telemonitoring, wireless technology and existent time abode tracking devices and their awarding for clinicians.

Results

Smart wear sensors are effective and reliable for preventative methods in many different facets of medicine such every bit, cardiopulmonary, vascular, endocrine, neurological function and rehabilitation medicine. These sensors have as well been shown to be accurate and useful for perioperative monitoring and rehabilitation medicine.

Conclusion

Although these devices accept been shown to be accurate and have clinical utility, they continue to be underutilized in the healthcare industry. Incorporating smart wearable sensors into routine intendance of patients could broaden physician-patient relationships, increment the autonomy and involvement of patients in regards to their healthcare and volition provide for novel remote monitoring techniques which volition revolutionize healthcare management and spending.

Peer Review reports

Background

Innovations in mobile and electronic healthcare are revolutionizing the involvement of both doctors and patients in the modernistic healthcare organization past extending the capabilities of physiological monitoring devices [1, ii]. Expansion of health information technology and consumer east-health tools and services, such as telemonitoring platform and mobile wellness applications [3], have created new opportunities for individuals to participate actively in their healthcare, and provides the opportunity for remote monitoring of clinically relevant variables in not-clinical settings [4]. These devices tin can be integrated into routine care of acute and chronic diseases and provides essential information for management to both the healthcare providers and patients [5]. Studies prove that a well-informed patient improves quality of life and patient issue because they are more probable to participate in healthy behavioral changes [vi, 7]. Furthermore, the United States spends approximately 75% of their $two trillion budget on chronic diseases per year, which make upwards 7 out of 10 deaths annually [8]. Chronic diseases also take debilitating effects, which lead the nation in causes of major disabilities and preventable illnesses [8].

The concept of remotely monitoring patients is not new but recently a lot of attention has been placed on smart vesture torso sensors (SWS) [4, 9]. Whereas other articles have focused primarily on devices which have been used for enquiry or have needed a physician's prescription, this commodity expands upon the opportunities and studies with devices that are available to all consumers. There is now more bear witness to support the reliability of these devices and the technology is more easily accessed. These devices incorporate an assortment of different sensors which can be used to monitor variables and transmit information either to a personal device or to an online storage site. The multifariousness of the sensors can be attributed to the types of stimuli that they respond to (e.yard. physiological vital signs, body movements, and organic substances) and their placements (clothing, subcutaneous implant, body role accessory, etc.) These devices accept the opportunity to meet the patients' needs by administering data in real-time to the patient'southward smartphone, computer or other wireless devices and has the potential to influence their behaviors [5, 6]. Sensors allow patients to self-monitor, track, and appraise human physiological data, while likewise providing interfaces and a dashboard for healthcare providers [7]. These sensors are easily managed and are becoming increasingly accurate and reliable for patient care [5, 10, 11]. The SWS'southward tin can as well be utilized every bit a diagnostic tool to aid in identifying and managing a myriad of diseases [7]. Current sensor technology for vital-sign monitoring promises great benefits for prevention, prediction, and management of diseases. Despite pregnant progress inside the monitoring device industry, the widespread integration of this technology into medical practice remains limited.

The purpose of this manuscript was to evaluate existing clothing sensors and describe their current medical applications.

We therefore used general search engines such as Pubmed, Science Straight, and Google Scholar to extensively search for "clothing sensor", "mHealth", "eHealth", "medical sensor", "Personal Area Network", "Body Area Network", "Trunk Sensor Networks", "Tracker", "Monitoring", "Self Tracking" and combination of these terms. The search was performed using pertinent Medical Subject Heading terms. Nosotros reviewed these studies in society to present clinical utility.

Wearable body sensors

The SWS include a wide range of article of clothing devices and sensors such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, smart fabrics and actuators, wireless communication networks and power supplies, and data capture technology for processing and decision support [12]. Having a vesture device decreases the restrictions placed on their move and daily activities which allows monitoring in the surround of the patients straight home merely likewise at work.

The virtually used and well-known sensor accelerometers are electrochemical sensors that measure out acceleration of objects in motion forth reference axes and provide bones pace and action counts used equally a quantitative assessment of physical activity [xi, 13]. This data tin can be used to obtain velocity and deportation by merging the data with respect to time [5]. Triaxial accelerometers, which monitor vibrations in three planes, tin find motility and posture, such as upright or lying down, according to the magnitude of acceleration signals forth sensitive axes [14, 15]. Gyroscopes are also another pop blazon of sensor. A gyroscope is a mechanical device that measures 3-D orientation based on the principles of angular momentum. A spinning rotor tends to maintain its orientation allowing the changes in orientation to be calculated by integrating the athwart velocity [xiv].

Placement of SWS is versatile and provides flexibility and comfort for patients, which is one of the keys for patient acceptance. In that location are many devices already on the market for fettle and wellness that use consumer-facing applications which can be hands incorporated into clinical practice. Near sensors can either exist worn or placed on wearing apparel. Some wearable devices can exist placed on the almost any part of the body: wrist, ankle, waist, chest, arm, legs, etc. These sensors tin can notice many dissimilar variables such every bit speed, distance, steps taken, floors climbed and calories burned [xvi]. Implementation of a real-time waist-mounted tri-axial accelerometer unit detects a range of basic daily activities, including walking and posture [17, 18]. Other possibilities for wearable sensor placement include gloves, rings, necklace, brooches, pins, earrings, and fifty-fifty belt buckles. These models have been used to monitor claret oxygen saturation (SpO2), eye rates, and tape manus posture while manipulating objects, such as eating or dressing [xix, xx]. A newly marketed device measures body temperature through the utilise of an ear probe which detects infrared radiation from the tympanic membrane [21]. Another approach which could be more user-friendly for patients is the placement of sensors in vesture, such as a vest or shoe. Smart Vest is a wearable physiological monitoring system for parameters such as, center rate, claret pressure level (BP), body temperature, galvanic skin responses, and can fifty-fifty perform electrocardiograms (ECG) [22]. In that location are also experimental designs, with promising preliminary results, demonstrating that sensors (heart rate, acceleration, and respiratory action) can exist incorporated into a regular t-shirt rather than a beefy vest, which adds another layer of convenience [23]. Placement in the shoe tin provide a more than user-friendly method to measure differences betwixt mean foot farthermost and gait footstep time for healthy gait and those with physical disorders, as well as proved highly capable of detecting foot orientation and position [22].

Self-tracking and monitoring

Traditionally at that place have been three widely accepted approaches for outpatient monitoring: patient reported outcomes (PRO), telemonitoring and quantifying cocky-hybrid models (QSHM) [24]. PRO models encourage the patient to be proactive past assuasive them to accept more autonomy. This is accomplished by having the patient self-written report a descriptive analysis of subjective information to their provider. Unfortunately, this data can be unreliable and inconsistent for objective measurements. Telemonitoring uses equipment to monitor physiological data passively, which is then transmitted to the patient and tin can besides be sent to their provider. This monitoring could extend or supplant routine outpatient care in dedicated hospital wards. Whereas PRO models study subjective data, telemonitoring can exist used to report objective data but a limitation to this applied science is that it is but capable of reporting quantifiable variables. Lastly, QSHMs accept been developed in club integrate the previous methods past allowing the patient to exist able to report their non-quantifiable variables while still having the ability to monitor quantifiable ones. This affiliation mitigates the information that may exist unreliable from the self-reporting coming from the patients and bypass the limitations of variables in the telemonitoring model. This model provides the ability for a patient to better empathise their healthcare by integrating complement models that combine subjective symptoms with objective criteria. The majority of SWS autumn nether the telemonitoring model only a few possess the ability to allow the user to input subjective information as well, which so follows the QSHM model. Ideally, SWS would continue this trend towards QSHMs.

Many individuals with chronic diseases could benefit from having constant remote monitoring and the best fashion to monitor a patient is through understanding their interactions with their daily activities. Giving the patient the opportunity to depart from the hospital and go along to monitor themselves will allow for a more authentic representation and a more than accurate assessment of physiological data. If patients could be monitored reliably abroad from the hospital, this could subtract the toll associated with the length of stay (LOS), which can greatly decrease healthcare costs and unintended consequences. Shifting the paradigm from a culture of treatment to i centered upon prevention.

Overview of direct clinical applications

Cardiopulmonary and vascular monitoring

The increment in reliable monitoring and reporting coupled with the versatility of sensor placement has facilitated efforts to implement SWS in clinical settings. Almost of the attention to date has been focused on blood pressure monitoring with at abode using sensors. The European guidelines on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention recommend frequent claret pressure monitoring in order to prevent coronary diseases [25]. The dominance of chronic diseases as the major global death contributors has emerged, and The World Wellness Arrangement (WHO) estimates there will be about 20 million CVD deaths in 2015, accounting for about 30 percent of worldwide deaths [26, 27]. Additionally, telehome monitoring has been demonstrated to improve quality of intendance in patients with CVD [28]. These statistics stimulated great need worldwide for a device that detects respiration rate, breathing patterns and fatal breathing changes for prevention of or early detection of CVD [28]. A new non-invasive long-term blood pressure measurement device measures the BP continuously on the wrist using ultrasound, a small airship, and an actuator [29]. A ring sensor has also been used to facilitate the management of hypertension and congestive eye failure [12].

Continuous multimodal measurement devices have as well been developed. The Advanced Medical Monitor (AMON) system is a wristwatch model with a multi-variable sensor device [xxx]. AMON contains an accelerometer that continuously measures physical activity and comprises other sensors in society to monitor BP, blood oxygen saturation, body temperature, and tin take an ECG [31–33]. Another wrist module was developed to measure BP by integrating a photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor and an ECG sensor, allowing for continuous monitoring [34, 35]. The Murata vital sign sensor uses the optical absorption of hemoglobin proteins to brand measurements of pulse and claret oxygen levels, and has 2 electrodes that mensurate the voltage differences generated by the heart. Murata's innovative algorithm also has the ability to estimate user fatigue levels and exercise stress [36].

Multiple types of cardiac monitoring devices exist. Some involve surgical implantation of wireless devices that can monitor and report data to a smart telephone and other devices tin requite patients access to a 24 h ECG via an adapter that acts as a phone cover. Most of the devices are external and can be placed on the wrist or around the thorax to accurately monitor cardiac function. An instance of an external device is AliveCor's integrated phone case and ECG leads, which allows patients to monitor and record their cardiac rhythms, likewise equally send their information to healthcare providers [37]. This device has been cleared by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) equally a Form II device and has received blessing of their 510(one thousand) in order to be available on the marketplace. The University of Southern California recently published an article regarding its reliability and utility of this device within the cardiovascular field [38]. With increasing computational capacity, storage capacity and ubiquitous connectivity, smart phones enable individuals to actively monitor their health in new locations [37]. Doctors could use these types of devices in order to diagnose early signs or cardiac abnormalities that could potentially lead to better outcomes for cardiac patients. Atrial fibrillation (Afib) is the virtually mutual cardiac disorder and may be asymptomatic. Most patients are not diagnosed with Afib until their condition worsens to the point of center assault, angina, stroke or heart failure. A recent study compared AliveCor's device to a standard 12-Lead ECG to encounter if information technology was suitable for screening silent Afib, and institute that the sensitivity and specificity were high and provided accurate and reliable data [39]. The cornerstone of Afib management is simply early detection and SWSs facilitate this.

Studies at Mayo Clinic using "off-the-shelf" monitors accept demonstrated the reliability and utility of accelerometers to assess mobility in the elderly after surgery [10]. In this study, they used wireless accelerometers on postoperative cardiac surgery patients and establish a correlation between the number of steps taken in their early recovery period, length of stay, and dismissal disposition [10].

Other multimodal sensors tin can monitor respiratory rate and concurrently monitor oxygen saturation, coughing events, and other respiratory variables. A good example of this blazon of monitoring is the microwave reflectometric vital signal sensing systems which have been adult to observe very weak microwaves that irradiate and scatter off the homo body [40]. A sensitive microwave sensor monitors the reflected waves, which change in phase in response to motions of the body, including the regular displacement of the chest during breathing or, the slight movement of the chest caused past the beating heart. This illustrates that these devices have an integrated arrangement of sensors that tin can be used to monitor different variables rather than needing separate devices for each individual variable. A contempo measurement system for drivers was introduced, where measuring the pressure applied to a gauge embedded in a seat belt derives the respiration rate [41]. Universal Biosensors of Melbourne Victoria have also been working on a creating an electrochemical sensor that tin mensurate prothrombin time for those patients who are taking warfarin [42].

Glucose dwelling house monitoring

While many self-management telephone applications take been flexibly tailored to individual health requirements through a routinely carried item, much research has been invested in determining blood glucose levels with article of clothing sensors [43]. A non-invasive continuous self-monitoring device could greatly increment the patient'due south autonomy and amend the efficacy in the management of diabetes [44]. Arm modules developed by Solianis Monitoring AG are a multi-sensor arroyo. The medium-length and long electrodes penetrate to deeper layers of tissue, providing information related to changes in glucose levels; the short electrode penetrates to the surface layer, providing data related to other parameters such every bit temperature and humidity [45].

A recent clinical trial sponsored by the Academy of Virginia studied the feasibility of a portable pancreas organisation in patients with type i diabetes mellitus [46]. Their method utilized a combination of a monitoring device and insulin pump to monitor their patients, along with a computer algorithm that incorporated a closed-loop command platform via a smart phone to modulate the concentration of insulin. Twenty participants were monitored over a 42 hour period and this study demonstrated that a smart phone was capable of operating as an outpatient closed-loop control device, which was comparable to an inpatient setting using a laptop configuration. This study supports the idea that physicians can accurately monitor their patients remotely and increases the patient's quality of life past assuasive a method of abiding monitoring without having to cheque their glucose levels periodically.

A recent innovation, that further accommodates individuals that are constantly monitoring their glucose levels, is a non-invasive ocular glucose sensor. Although this engineering is even so under development, many companies are creating contact lenses that have an integrated diagnostic sensor that detects glucose levels and transmits them to a personal device. Some versions of this glucose monitor use tears as a source of free energy [47]. Google has recently taken their prototype to the FDA for early on independent clinical trials [48]. Their product checks the ocular glucose levels every second and they are also experimenting with placement of a light-emitting diode (LED) light that will shine when glucose levels are non within a particular range. Although this technology is yet years away from being released for consumers, it acknowledges that at that place is a need from the consumer for more user-friendly methods to increase their quality of life.

Neurological function monitoring

Ane surface area that has great potential and has had success with SWS is neurological monitoring; specifically in post-operative management, outpatient care and rehabilitation medicine. These sensors take the ability to seamlessly analyze gait, limb paralysis, cerebral palsy, and have diagnostic capabilities such equally, early on detection of Parkinson'southward (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (Advert). A study in 2009 used two different sensors, AMP 331 and Minimod, one placed on the lower back and another placed superior to the right ankle, to monitor gait in children with cognitive palsy (CP) and compared them to matched controls [32]. This study determined that sensors are a reliable method to monitor gait in children with CP and also demonstrated that not all sensors are accurate and reliable. The Minimod sensors were more reliable and authentic when monitoring the average stride length and step count with both groups compared to the AMP sensors, suggesting that more research needs to exist conducted to ensure that the right information is existence used. Another study conducted in 2011 using inertial sensors that provided auditory and visual feedback demonstrated a rehabilitative approach to sensors [49]. This study demonstrated that patients with CP related gait disorders had a 21% residual brusque-term improvement in walking speed and 8% increment in stride length with visual feedback, as well as an average brusk-term improvement of 25% in walking speed and 13% in stride length for auditory feedback. The results were compared to matched controls, which did not evidence a measurable change in gait [49].

Sensors can also be used to monitor seizure activity in patients. Preliminary studies conducted at Stanford University Medical Heart demonstrated that a wristwatch fashion device named "SmartWatch" was able to detect seven out of 8 full seizures and accurately transmitted this information to the patient'due south caregiver [fifty]. While "SmartWatch" cannot predict seizures, this sensor allows caregivers to be alerted and react more than quickly, decreasing the probability of serious injury or expiry. Accelerometers have likewise been used every bit a reliable and objective device to monitor the free-living physical activity of forty stroke patients [51]. Rand et al., monitored subjects for three consecutive days and on a half-dozen-minute walk and constitute these devices to exist consistent. They too mention that the concrete activity was very low, with 58% of the participants not meeting the recommended activeness levels. This pertinent information provides both the provider and patient the objective data needed in order to modulate and manage handling in an effective manner while allowing the patient the power to stay home.

Sensors have also played a critical function in the detection of Alzheimer's Disease. Pathologically, these patients undergo degeneration of the suprachiasmatic nucleus, which effects cyclic pace makers, which lead to an impairment of temporal construction with move beliefs. Researchers from Reckoner Science and Electrical Engineering of Rostock University and the German language Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock, placed iii-axis accelerometers on the ankles of 23 dyads (n = 46) consisting of diagnosed Alzheimer's patients and healthy command subjects [52]. The subjects were chosen from a sample of customs dwelling individuals and were matched according to age, gender and didactics. A trained medical student placed the sensors on the dyads on the first 24-hour interval and would so remove them on the third solar day, allowing for continuous monitoring of the subjects. The novel algorithm was able to discern unlabeled Alzheimer's patients from healthy control subjects 91% of the time; this coincides with a higher rate than the conventional Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory [52]. The author'due south state that the higher accuracy denoted in this written report suggests that the spectral structure is associated with clinical diagnosis of Advertisement.

Much research has also been invested in monitoring patients with PD. The gimmicky clinical assessment does not fairly reflect the patients' actual status during daily life. Weiss et al. initiated a project to appraise mobility in patients with PD, with the use of SWS [53]. Healthy adults and patients with PD wore a triaxial accelerometer on their waist during brusk walks. They used frequency-domain measures to quantify gait variability in the daily living environment. The boilerplate stride time was statistically pregnant for the PD patients than for the controls and the walking patterns of the PD patients were less consistent. Average stride times were reported as being highly correlated to the dominant frequency. Weiss concluded that frequency-based measures and sensitive estimates to footstep-to-step variability could serve as an objective, easily calculated marker of gait variability in real-world settings and the ease of the sensor placement and monitoring allows this to be a viable option.

Neurological role monitoring has been successful in these applications and can be extended towards other populations of diseases and disorders. The aforementioned studies demonstrate the clinical relevance and the potential for clinical utility. The integration of SWS allows the physicians to be able to notice earlier diseases, monitor and attune recovery of patients and create novel therapies for rehabilitation.

Physical therapy and rehabilitation

The SWSs are able to monitor mobility in specific therapeutic exercises designed for rehabilitation to provide objective criteria of the progression of the patient. This data tin be used to assistance ameliorate exercise techniques, thereby aiding the patient to maximize therapeutic recovery. The wearable wellness-monitoring device tin be integrated into a user'south wearable and performs real-time analysis of sensors' data, provides guidance and feedback to the user, and tin can generate warnings based on the user'south country, level of activity, and environmental conditions [54].

Sensors accept likewise been integrated into pulmonary rehabilitation. This includes graded exercises, strength and flexibility preparation, collaborative self-management education, and has been shown to improve physical performance and life quality. Sensors are now considered an integral component of optimal care for people with astringent lung illness [52]. Steele et al., who provide an overview of the potential utility of motility sensors to mensurate physical activity in people with chronic pulmonary diseases, concluded that SWS, specifically accelerometers, have considerable potential for answering questions related to pulmonary rehabilitation, such every bit how to encourage participants to appoint in exercise and increment their overall activeness [55]. Accelerometers can measure the efficacy adherence intervention of patients following a pulmonary rehabilitation plan to promote physical activity and practise following plan completion. While most of the inquiry has been devoted to sensors involving therapy, sensors for prevention and early detection equally diagnostic tools are becoming increasingly active.

Prevention and motivational aspects of sensors

The numerous advancements in SWS are primarily due to the "quantified self" [iv]. The quantified cocky is a motility to incorporate technology regarding healthcare into regular information acquisition to create more than transparency and customization, give the patients greater admission and decision making regarding their health, and improve healthcare systems overall. The quantified self is evolving the office of the patient from a minimally informed recipient, to an active collaborator by creating better doctor-patient partnership models [four]. The main focus of the evolving health intendance model has, thus far, been in regards to therapeutic and handling models for sick patients. However, more patient driven health resources, like SWS, are converging to produce a tendency of increased personal health surveillance and monitoring then good for you consumers can go empowered to make healthy choices equally preventative measures. According to Pew Internet Enquiry, who carried out the kickoff U.S. national self-tracking survey, 69% of U.S. adults track at to the lowest degree i health indicator for themselves, or a loved one and approximately half of them stated that tracking these variables has changed their overall arroyo to health [39]. Out of the 3014 subjects surveyed, threescore% stated they tracked their weight, diet, or do routines, 33% tracked health indicators or symptoms like claret pressure, blood saccharide, headache, or slumber patterns, and 12% tracked health indicators or symptoms for a loved one. This demonstrates a growing interest from the population to existence able to admission this data. The SWS and other emerging patient driven technology are particularly focusing on the earlier stages of healthcare, targeting prevention rather than reacting towards unfavorable outcomes. Consumer reflection on SWS information could exist extended to innovative perspectives to the overall consideration of wellness care. The patient can become more of an informed participant and take agile responsibility in their health past taking salubrious preventative measures. By providing wellness management information, the quantified self engages good for you patients in a variety of self-tracking and management methods that can be utilized for disease prevention, farther developing the overall wellness care system.

Discussion

Table 1 summarizes the sensors that were reviewed in this article. This narrative review intended to provide an overview of the clinically relevant developments and utility of SWS. While increasing admission to monitoring devices for patients has great potential to augment healthcare, this information can be misunderstood and misused.

Tabular array one Review of sensors

Total size table

A major barrier for the implementation of SWS is the reliability and efficiency of sensor systems and data processing software [56]. Some of the studies reported in this review had authors who were also the system developers. This could lead to positive biases for their products and the famine of randomized clinical trials, either for practical reasons or logistical ones, makes it difficult to truly scrutinize the results. However, many studies are being conducted to ameliorate the reliability of sensors [56, 57]. Smart wearable sensors, specifically accelerometer-based devices, have undergone many trials to determine their accuracy and precision. While accelerometers in a broad sense have been proven effective [58], private studies and devices each require mean and variance determinations and adjustments to proceeds the most accurate results for the desired values. Some studies have even used multiple sensors on patients to combine information to achieve optimal results. A study by Olguin and Pentland compared the activity recognition accuracy of four configurations of accelerometers from iii placements; the breast, wrist, and hip [59]. The mean and variance of the iii axes were used as inputs to a Hidden Markov model. The classifier achieved an accuracy of 65% using only one accelerometer placed at the chest. By combining data from accelerometers placed on the wrist and hip, the accuracy increased to 87%. They also found that it is possible to obtain like results using only two accelerometers placed on the breast and hip. Other chest-worn accelerometers are able to detect respiratory and snoring features for sleep apnea diagnosis [60].

Many SWS employ algorithms to transform data obtained and many times the results are only estimates of the physiological data. There are a myriad of variables that could influence the estimates and their generalizability needs to be confirmed by the physicians and patients. This review attempted to use articles that demonstrated real-world applications of these devices rather than studies which take only been used in laboratories. The optimal awarding of these devices would be to tailor each i to the individual using them and regularly calibrate whenever necessary. Although healthcare is always trying to increment patient's autonomy and create a harmonious relationship betwixt physicians and patients, endowed with this technology some patients could erroneously disregard the office of the physician. This could be circumvented through patient education and understanding of the limits of this technology. There is no "i size fits all solution", and matching the right technology for a given patient population or desired clinical objective is central to ensuring sufficient perceived usefulness and uptake [61–63]. Furthermore, with sensors that operate on closed-loop systems, such as the aforementioned sensors for diabetic patients and Advertising, the adaptability of these SWS can be used equally a method to provide personalized medicine to patients in novel means that were not available before. Rather than strict monitoring, these devices have the power to calculate idiosyncratic patterns that can be used to modulate handling and tailor it to the specific needs of the individual. As admission to these devices continues to increase, the feasibility of more direct comparisons of these devices will exist available.

Additionally, SWSs can however be very expensive and, to the best of these authors' noesis, there accept nonetheless to be a designation of codes for reimbursement of these devices [64]. We believe that as the trend to utilize these devices past patients and physicians continues to rise, somewhen these will be integrated into the coding systems that will permit for reimbursement of products for consumers. With the increase in physician shortages, some states, such as Maryland, have already started to expand coverage through telemedicine for delivery of health care services [65].

Legal and upstanding bug such every bit privacy data protection and buying are also major concerns of any Internet-based awarding. The residue between the patient as the owner of data and the documentation and use of the information must be properly managed, with patient confidentiality ever at the forefront without impeding the development of innovative solutions. Moreover, researchers believe that SWSs introduce risks of social inclusion of users [66]. Lastly, elderly users strive for independence and any engineering that seems to limit their independence will be met with opposition [67].

Conclusion

The evolution of SWS and their ability to rails mobility, health indicators, and symptoms take nifty potential that can revolutionize the healthcare arrangement and modify patient behavior. Driven by the quantified self, emerging patient driven healthcare models are contributing to shaping a positive futurity for healthcare with the patient at the epicenter. Rather than a physician reacting to an effect that occurred to a patient, the SWS distributes responsibility to the patients which can lead to more personalized medicine. There has already been a host of clinical applications involving SWS that have been analyzed, including only not limited to blood pressure level, cardiac monitoring, respiratory rate, blood electrolyte and glucose concentration systems, neurological monitoring, and physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. These technologies are continuously beingness improved upon and can extend into whatsoever field of medicine. All the same, the integration of wireless technologies requires an infrastructure of bear witness regarding reliability, validity, and responsiveness for each application beyond a range of disease and injury related disorders while too contributing to preventative methods. Collaboration between physicians, patients, engineers, and the wireless industry is essential for the design and optimization of inexpensive wireless systems. Further studies and clinical trials are needed to farther this research and provide better overall models for patients. The quantified cocky is being pioneered by the patients and is revolutionizing patient beliefs as they adopt healthy behavioral changes into preventative measures. These changes will alter the mode that countries utilize funds on healthcare, set guidelines for protocols regarding preventative and mail service-operative monitoring, and augment the physician-patient human relationship. Incorporating these technologies now volition facilitate the transition and increase favorable outcomes in the future.

References

  1. Ricciardi L, Mostashari F, Murphy J, Daniel JG, Siminerio EP: A national action plan to support consumer appointment via eastward-health. Wellness Aff (Millwood). 2013, 32: 376-84. 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1216.

    Article  Google Scholar

  2. Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R: Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006, 60 (2): 102-114. x.1016/j.pec.2005.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  3. Hayakawa M, Uchimura Y, Omae Thou, Waki K, Fujita H, Ohe G: A smartphone-based medication self-direction system with realtime medication monitoring. Appl Clin Inform. 2013, 4: 37-52. 10.4338/ACI-2012-10-RA-0045.

    CAS  Commodity  PubMed  PubMed Cardinal  Google Scholar

  4. Swan Chiliad: Emerging patient-driven wellness care models: an exam of wellness social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009, half-dozen: 492-525. 10.3390/ijerph6020492.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  5. Chen KY, Bassett DR: The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005, 37: S490-S500. 10.1249/01.mss.0000185571.49104.82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  6. Dobkin BH, Dorsch A: The promise of mHealth: daily action monitoring and effect assessments by wearable sensors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011, 25 (ix): 788-798. 10.1177/1545968311425908.

    Commodity  PubMed  PubMed Primal  Google Scholar

  7. Darwish A, Hassanien AE: Wearable and Implantable wireless sensor network solutions for healthcare monitoring. Sensors. 2011, 11 (6): 5561-5595.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  8. CDC—chronic disease prevention and health promotion. [http://www.cdc.gov/fmo/topic/budget%20information/factsheets/CHRONIC_Factsheet.pdf]

  9. Bonato P: Advances in habiliment engineering science and its medical applications. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010, 2010: 2021-2024.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  10. Melt DJ, Thompson JE, Prinsen SK, Dearani JA, Deschamps C: Functional recovery in the elderly after major surgery: assessment of mobility recovery using wireless technology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013, 96: 1057-61. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  11. Yang C-C, Hsu Y-L: A review of accelerometry-based wear motion detectors for physical activity monitoring. Sensors. 2010, 10 (8): 7772-7788. 10.3390/s100807772.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Cardinal  Google Scholar

  12. Chan M, Estève D, Fourniols J-Y, Escriba C, Campo E: Smart habiliment systems: current status and future challenges. Artif Intell Med. 2012, 56 (iii): 137-156. ten.1016/j.artmed.2012.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  13. Mathie MJ, Coster ACF, Lovell NH, Celler BG: Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement. Physiol Meas. 2004, 25: R1-R20. 10.1088/0967-3334/25/2/R01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  14. Luinge HJ, Veltink PH: Measuring orientation of human trunk segments using miniature gyroscopes and accelerometers. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005, 43: 273-282. x.1007/BF02345966.

    CAS  Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

  15. Yang C-C, Hsu Y-L: Development of a wearable motion detector for telemonitoring and real-fourth dimension identification of physical activity. Telemed J Due east Health. 2009, 15: 62-72. 10.1089/tmj.2008.0060.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  16. Montgomery-Downs HE, Insana SP, Bail JA: Motility toward a novel activeness monitoring device. Sleep Breath. 2012, 16 (3): 913-917. 10.1007/s11325-011-0585-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  17. Sekine G, Tamura T, Togawa T, Fukui Y: Nomenclature of waist-dispatch signals in a continuous walking record. Med Eng Phys. 2000, 22: 285-291. 10.1016/S1350-4533(00)00041-two.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  18. Karantonis DM, Narayanan MR, Mathie M, Lovell NH, Celler BG: Implementation of a Real-Time Man Move Classifier Using a Triaxial Accelerometer for Ambulatory Monitoring. 2006, 10: 156-167.

    Google Scholar

  19. Simone LK, Sundarrajan N, Luo Ten, Jia Y, Kamper DG: A low cost instrumented glove for extended monitoring and functional hand cess. J Neurosci Methods. 2007, 160: 335-348. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.09.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  20. Wu YC, Chen P-F, Hu ZA, Chang CH, Lee GC, Yu WC: A mobile health monitoring system using RFID ring-type pulse sensor [abstract]. Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing. 2009, 1: 317-

    Google Scholar

  21. Rhoads FA, Grandner J: Cess of an audible infrared sensor for trunk temperature measurement in children. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1990, 29: 112-115. 10.1177/000992289002900209.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  22. Pandian PS, Mohanavelu K, Safeer KP, Kotresh TM, Shakunthala DT, Gopal P, Padaki VC: Smart belong: vesture multi-parameter remote physiological monitoring arrangement. Med Eng Phys. 2008, 30: 466-477. ten.1016/j.medengphy.2007.05.014.

    CAS  Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

  23. Sardini East, Serpelloni K: T-shirt for vital parameter monitoring. Lect Notes Electr Eng. 2014, 162: 201-205. 10.1007/978-i-4614-3860-1_35.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  24. Geoff A, Eric Southward, Pierre R, Yves J, Jean-Yves Reginster ESC: A disquisitional assessment of approaches to outpatient monitoring. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014, thirty: 1-2. ten.1185/03007995.2013.842165.

    Article  Google Scholar

  25. Ton V-K, Martin SS, Blumenthal RS, Blaha MJ: Comparing the new European cardiovascular disease prevention guideline with prior American heart association guidelines: an editorial review. Clin Cardiol. 2013, 36: E1-6. 10.1002/clc.22079.

    Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

  26. World Health Organisation: [http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/full_report.pdf]

  27. Fuster V, Kelly B: Promoting Cardiovascular Wellness in the Developing World: A Critical Challenge to Accomplish Global Wellness. 2010

    Google Scholar

  28. Chandrasekara 5: Measuring Vital Signs Using Smart Phones. 2010, Denton, Texas: University of Due north Texas

    Google Scholar

  29. Weber S, Scharfschwerdt P, Seel T, Kertzscher U, Affeld M: Continuous wrist blood force per unit area measurement with ultrasound. Biomed Tech. 2013, 58: i-ii.

    Google Scholar

  30. Scheffler Chiliad, Hirt E: Wearable devices for telemedicine applications. J Telemed Telecare. 2005, xi (Suppl 1): 11-14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  31. Lindemann U, Hock A, Stuber M, Keck W, Becker C: Evaluation of a fall detector based on accelerometers: a airplane pilot written report. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005, 43: 548-551. 10.1007/BF02351026.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  32. Kuo Y-L, Culhane KM, Thomason P, Tirosh O, Baker R: Measuring altitude walked and pace count in children with cerebral palsy: an evaluation of two portable activity monitors. Gait Posture. 2009, 29: 304-310. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.09.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  33. Lukowicz P, Anliker U, Ward J, Troster Thou, Hirt E, Neufelt C: AMON: a wearable medical computer for high risk patients. Proceedings Sixth Int Symp Wearable Comput. 2002, 133-134.

    Chapter  Google Scholar

  34. Poon CCY, Zhang YT: Cuff-less and noninvasive measurements of arterial claret force per unit area by pulse transit fourth dimension. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2005, 6: 5877-5880.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  35. Poon CCYPCCY, Wong YMWYM, Zhang Y-TZY-T: M-Health: the development of cuff-less and article of clothing blood pressure level meters for use in body sensor networks. 2006 IEEE/NLM Life Sci Syst Appl Work. 2006, 1-two.

    Chapter  Google Scholar

  36. Murata Manufacturing Company. [http://www.murata.com/]

  37. Paul G, David A, Dwight Reynolds A: Accuracy and novelty of an inexpensive iPhone-based issue recorder [abstract]. Heart Rhythm. 2012, sp23

    Google Scholar

  38. Saxon LA: Ubiquitous wireless ECG recording: a powerful tool physicians should embrace. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013, 24: 480-483. 10.1111/jce.12097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  39. Paton C, Hansen Chiliad, Fernandez-Luque L, YS L a: Self-Tracking, social media and personal health records for patient empowered self-care. contribution of the IMIA social media working group. Yearb Med Inform. 2012, 7: xvi-24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  40. Nagae D, Mase A: Measurement of heart rate variability and stress evaluation by using microwave reflectometric vital signal sensing. Rev Sci Instrum. 2010, 81: 094301-x.1063/1.3478017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  41. Dokhan B, Setz C, Arnrich B, Töster Chiliad: Monitoring passenger's animate - a feasibility written report. Swiss Soc Biomed Eng Annu Meet. 2007, i: one-

    Google Scholar

  42. Universal biosensors. [http://www.universalbiosensors.com/Products.aspx]

  43. Rao A, Hou P, Golnik T, Flaherty J, Vu S: Evolution of data management tools for managing self-monitoring of blood glucose results: a survey of iPhone applications. J diabetes Sci Technol. 2010, 4: 949-957. 10.1177/193229681000400426.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  44. Leelarathna Fifty, English SW, Thabit H, Caldwell M, Allen JM, Kumareswaran K, Wilinska ME, Nodale M, Haidar A, Evans ML, Burnstein R, Hovorka R: Accuracy of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in critically sick adults: improved sensor performance with enhanced calibrations. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014, sixteen: 97-101. 10.1089/dia.2013.0221.

    CAS  Commodity  PubMed  PubMed Fundamental  Google Scholar

  45. Zanon M, Sparacino 1000, Facchinetti A, Riz M, Talary MS, Suri RE, Caduff A, Cobelli C: Non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring: improved accuracy of bespeak and trend estimates of the multisensor system. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012, 50 (10): 1047-1057. 10.1007/s11517-012-0932-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  46. Kovatchev BP, Renard Eastward, Cobelli C, Zisser HC, Keith-Hynes P, Anderson SM, Brown SA, Chernavvsky DR, Breton MD, Farret A, Pelletier M-J, Place J, Bruttomesso D, Del Favero S, Visentin R, Filippi A, Scotton R, Avogaro A, Doyle FJ: Feasibility of outpatient fully integrated closed-loop control: first studies of wearable artificial pancreas. Diabetes Intendance. 2013, 36: 1851-8. ten.2337/dc12-1965.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  47. Zhang J, Hodge W, Hutnick C, Wang X: Noninvasive diagnostic devices for diabetes through measuring tear glucose. J diabetes Sci Technol. 2011, five: 166-172. 10.1177/193229681100500123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  48. Forbes. [http://world wide web.forbes.com/sites/ptc/2014/02/12/google-contacts-will-assist-diabetics-monitor-blood-saccharide-via-tears/]

  49. Baram Y, Lenger R: Gait improvement in patients with cognitive palsy by visual and auditory feedback. Neuromodulation. 2012, 15: 48-52. ten.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00412.x. discussion 52

    Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

  50. Lockman J, Fisher RS, Olson DM: Detection of seizure-similar movements using a wrist accelerometer. Epilepsy Behav. 2011, twenty: 638-641. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.01.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  51. Rand D, Eng JJ, Tang P-F, Jeng J-South, Hung C: How active are people with stroke?: apply of accelerometers to assess physical activity. Stroke. 2009, 40: 163-168. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  52. Kirste T, Hoffmeyer A, Koldrack P, Bauer A, Schubert Due south, Schröder Due south, Teipel S: Detecting the result of Alzheimer'due south disease on everyday motion behavior. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014, 38: 121-32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  53. Weiss A, Sharifi South, Plotnik Thou, van Vugt JPP, Giladi North, Hausdorff JM: Toward automatic, at-dwelling house assessment of mobility amidst patients with Parkinson affliction, using a body-worn accelerometer. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011, 25 (9): 810-818. 10.1177/1545968311424869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  54. Jovanov E, Milenkovic A, Otto C, de Groen PC: A wireless body area network of intelligent motion sensors for computer assisted physical rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2005, 2: half-dozen-ten.1186/1743-0003-2-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  55. Bonnie S, Basia B, Kevin C, Catherine West, Jeff Coppersmith JH: Bodies in move: monitoring daily activeness and practice with motility sensors in people with chronic pulmonary disease. J Rehabil Dev. 2003, 40: 45-10.1682/JRRD.2003.10.0045.

    Article  Google Scholar

  56. Wagenaar RC, Sapir I, Zhang Y, Markovic S, Vaina LM, Little TDC: Continuous monitoring of functional activities using wearable, wireless gyroscope and accelerometer technology. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011, 2011: 4844-4847.

    Google Scholar

  57. Fulk G, Combs SA, Danks KA, Nirider CD, Bhavana Raja DSR: Accurateness of 2 activity monitors in detecting steps in people with stroke and traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther. 2014, 94: 222-229. 10.2522/ptj.20120525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  58. Bassett DR, John D: Use of pedometers and accelerometers in clinical populations: validity and reliability issues. Phys Ther Rev. 2010, 15 (iii): 135-142. 10.1179/1743288X10Y.0000000004.

    Article  Google Scholar

  59. Daniel Olguín O, Alex P: Social Sensors for Automatic Data Collection. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems. fourteen-17 August 2008, Toronto, 14-

    Google Scholar

  60. Morillo DS, Rojas Ojeda JL, Crespo Foix LF, Jiménez AL: An accelerometer-based device for sleep apnea screening. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010, 14: 491-499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  61. Wicks P, Stamford J, Grootenhuis MA, Haverman 50, Ahmed Due south: Innovations in eastward-health. Qual Life Res. 2014, 23: 195-203. x.1007/s11136-013-0458-ten.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  62. Bergmann JHM, McGregor AH: Body-worn sensor design: what do patients and clinicians want?. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011, 39: 2299-2312. 10.1007/s10439-011-0339-nine.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  63. Bergmann JHM, Chandaria 5, McGregor A: Wearable and implantable sensors: the patient'southward perspective. Sensors (Basel). 2012, 12: 16695-709. 10.3390/s121216695.

    Article  Google Scholar

  64. Chan M, Estève D, Escriba C, Campo East: A review of smart homes- present country and future challenges. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008, 91: 55-81. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  65. 2014 medicare changes expand coverage for telemedicine. [http://mhcc.dhmh.maryland.gov/hit/telemedicine/Documents/telemedicine_2014medicarechanges_summary.pdf]

  66. John Percival JH: Large blood brother or brave new earth? Telecare and its implications for older people's independence and social inclusion. Crit Soc Policy. 2006, 26: 888-909. x.1177/0261018306068480.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

  67. Steele R, Lo A, Secombe C, Wong YK: Elderly persons' perception and credence of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int J Med Inform. 2009, 78: 788-801. ten.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.001.

    Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

Download references

Disclosure

Equity interest (1000.A.) in Folup, Inc and Youv Labs, Inc.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Section of Neurological Surgery, Neurodigital Initiative, Columbia University, 630 Westward 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA

    Geoff Appelboom, Elvis Camacho, Mickey E Abraham, Brad E Zacharia & E Sander Connolly Jr

  2. The Joan and Irwin Jacobs Technion-Cornell Innovation Institute, Cornell NYC Tech 111 8th Avenue #302, New York, NY, 10011, USA

    Samuel South Bruce & Emmanuel LP Dumont

  3. Bartoli Encephalon Tumor Research Laboratory, Columbia Academy Irving Cancer Enquiry Center Columbia Academy Medical Center, 1130 St. Nicholas Ave., New York, NY, 10032, USA

    Randy D'Amico

  4. Section of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economic science, University of Liège, Liège, Kingdom of belgium and Support Unit in Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Public Wellness Sciences, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

    Justin Slomian, Jean Yves Reginster & Olivier Bruyère

Respective writer

Correspondence to Geoff Appelboom.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors exercise not have any potential or actual competing interest.

Authors' contributions

All authors have contributed significantly to this manuscript. All authors have contributed to either (1) the conception, design, and acquisition of data (GA, EC, MA, SB, ED) (2) drafting the article (GA, MA, EC, SB, ED, BZ, RD, JS, OB, JYR, ESC) and (3) revising it critically for important intellectual content (GA,OB, JYR, ESC). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed nether the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted employ, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/i.0/) applies to the data made bachelor in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

Almost this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Appelboom, G., Camacho, E., Abraham, 1000.East. et al. Smart wearable torso sensors for patient cocky-assessment and monitoring. Curvation Public Health 72, 28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3258-72-28

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accustomed:

  • Published:

  • DOI : https://doi.org/x.1186/2049-3258-72-28

Keywords

  • Sensors
  • Mobile wellness
  • eHealth
  • Patient education
  • Quantified patient

longrabliver.blogspot.com

Source: https://archpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2049-3258-72-28

Postar um comentário for "What Is the Name for Monitoring Bodily Processes So That a Patient Can Learn to Control Them?"